[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5201C4AB.4070309@asianux.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:53:15 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, xi.wang@...il.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value
'result'
On 08/07/2013 06:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:29:42 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Improve the usage of return value 'result', so not only can make code
>>> clearer to readers, but also can improve the performance.
>>
>> It used to be pervasive kernel style do to
>>
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> foo = alloc(...);
>> if (!foo)
>> goto out;
>>
>> whereas nowadays people usually do the more straightforward
>>
>> foo = alloc(...);
>> if (!foo) {
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> The thinking was that the old style generated better code, but for the
>> life of me I can't remember why :(
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/16/383
>
Thank you for your information.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists