| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbte37s-nG-QqmbD=TrVEsSDBFTRX0fjbfUfHpwHSjLDw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 20:59:23 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: choose appropriate handler for level interrupts On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com> wrote: > The current implementation handle both edge and level interrupts with the > 'handle_simple_irq' handler. > > Level interrupts are active as long as the pin stays at the configured > level (low or high). In this case we have to use 'handle_level_irq' which > mask the interrupt until the handle has treated it. > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com> Patch applied with Alexandre's Tested-by tag. Worst thing that can happen is that I have to revert it. Now it will atleast get some testing in linux-next. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists