[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5201D180.9080005@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 21:48:00 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: gleb@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org, x86@...nel.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, peterz@...radead.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, attilio.rao@...rix.com, ouyang@...pitt.edu,
gregkh@...e.de, agraf@...e.de, chegu_vinod@...com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi.kivity@...il.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
On 08/06/2013 07:54 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 02:31 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> What is the baseline for this patchset? I tried to apply it on top of
>> 3.11-rc4 and I got nontrivial conflicts.
>>
>
> I had based it on top of 445363e8 [ Merge branch 'perf/urgent']
> of tip. Sorry for not mentioning that.
>
> Please let me know, if I should rebase again.
>
tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need
to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists