[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130807151611.7651be058d537610ea1b05bf@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 15:16:11 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the ext4 tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
fs/ext4/extents_status.c between commit 49c6efc7b80e ("ext4: add new
ioctl EXT4_IOC_PRECACHE_EXTENTS") from the ext4 tree and commit "fs:
convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API" from the akpm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 00e6589,9f931b2..0000000
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@@ -1091,9 -1044,7 +1102,9 @@@ static int __es_try_to_reclaim_extents(
struct ext4_es_tree *tree = &ei->i_es_tree;
struct rb_node *node;
struct extent_status *es;
- int nr_shrunk = 0;
+ long nr_shrunk = 0;
+ static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
+ DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
if (ei->i_es_lru_nr == 0)
return 0;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists