[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130808092707.7149ee90@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:27:07 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Ken Steele <ken@...era.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAID: add tilegx SIMD implementation of raid6
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:39:56 -0400 Ken Steele <ken@...era.com> wrote:
> This change adds TILE-Gx SIMD instructions to the software raid
> (md), modeling the Altivec implementation. This is only for Syndrome
> generation; there is more that could be done to improve recovery,
> as in the recent Intel SSE3 recovery implementation.
>
> The code unrolls 8 times; this turns out to be the best on tilegx
> hardware among the set 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16. The code reads one
> cache-line of data from each disk, stores P and Q then goes to the
> next cache-line.
>
> The test code in sys/linux/lib/raid6/test reports 2008 MB/s data
> read rate for syndrome generation using 18 disks (16 data and 2
> parity). It was 1512 MB/s before this SIMD optimizations. This is
> running on 1 core with all the data in cache.
>
> This is based on the paper The Mathematics of RAID-6.
> (http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/raid6.pdf).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ken Steele <ken@...era.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Thanks. Looks credible and you've obviously tested it so I've added it to my
queue for the next merge window.
One tiny little change I made:
> clean:
> rm -f *.o *.a mktables mktables.c *.uc int*.c altivec*.c tables.c raid6test
> + rm tilegx*.c
I made that "rm -f" for consistency.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists