[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F0FBDD9-129C-45F4-A20C-3EB2E8EFC9C8@coraid.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 19:41:48 -0400
From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aoe: adjust ref of head for compound page tails
On Aug 7, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:18:35 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 17:12:36 -0400 Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 7, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:29:59 -0400 Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As discussed previously,
>>>>
>>>> I think I missed that.
>>>>
>>>>> the fact that some users of the block
>>>>> layer provide bios that point to pages with a zero _count means
>>>>> that it is not OK for the network layer to do a put_page on the
>>>>> skb frags during an skb_linearize, so the aoe driver gets a
>>>>> reference to pages in bios and puts the reference before ending
>>>>> the bio. And because it cannot use get_page on a page with a
>>>>> zero _count, it manipulates the value directly.
>>>>
>>>> Eh? What code is putting count==0 pages into bios? That sounds very
>>>> weird and broken.
>>>
>>> I thought so in 2007 but couldn't solicit a clear "this is wrong" consensus from the discussion.
>>>
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/499197
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/19/56
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/18/230
>>>
>>> We were seeing zero-count pages in bios from XFS, but Christoph Hellwig pointed out that kmalloced pages can also come from ext3 when it's doing log recovery, and they'll have zero page counts.
>>
>> aiiee!
>>
>> It is (I suppose) reasonable to put kmalloced memory into a BIO's page
>> array. And it is perfectly reasonable for a user of that bio to do a
>> get_page/put_page against that page. It is utterly unreasonable for
>> the damn page to get freed as a result!
>>
>> I'd claim that slab is broken. The page is in use, so it should have an
>> elevated refcount, full stop.
>>
>
> err, no. slab.c uses alloc_pages(), so the underlying page indeed has
> a proper refcount. I'm still not understanding how this situation comes
> about.
It sounds like it's wrong to give block pages with a zero count, so why not just have aoe BUG_ON(compound_trans_head(bv->page->_count) == 0) until we're sure nobody does that anymore?
If that idea makes sense to you, I will submit a new patch to follow the one under discussion.
--
Ed Cashin
ecashin@...aid.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists