[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130807165125.38a4acd2a8bc533e52d07d06@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:51:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aoe: adjust ref of head for compound page tails
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 19:41:48 -0400 Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >> elevated refcount, full stop.
> >>
> >
> > err, no. slab.c uses alloc_pages(), so the underlying page indeed has
> > a proper refcount. I'm still not understanding how this situation comes
> > about.
>
> It sounds like it's wrong to give block pages with a zero count,
Depends on your definition of "page". It should be OK to put a
_count==0 tail page into a BIO, because the MM knows that it's a tail
page and that its refcount actually lives in the head page.
> so why not just have aoe BUG_ON(compound_trans_head(bv->page->_count) == 0) until we're sure nobody does that anymore?
AOE shouldn't be touching ->_count at all. That's why it has the
leading underscore. If AOE can stick with the usual interfaces such as
page_count(), everything should work?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists