[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130807153840.4f2997b603397c07aca98b2d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 15:38:40 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
Hi Sedat,
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:16:57 +0200 Sedat Dilek
<sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the ext4 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/ext4/ialloc.c: In function '__ext4_new_inode':
> > fs/ext4/ialloc.c:817:1: warning: label 'next_ino' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
> > next_ino:
> > ^
> > fs/ext4/ialloc.c:792:4: error: label 'next_inode' used but not defined
> > goto next_inode;
> > ^
> >
> > Hmm ...
> >
> > Caused by commit 4a8603ef197a ("ext4: avoid reusing recently deleted
> > inodes in no journal mode").
> >
> > I have used the ext4 tree from next-20130726 for today.
>
> Since this message ext4-tree was not updated.
> The commit "ext4: avoid reusing recently deleted inodes in no journal
> mode" was refreshed and has a different commit-id.
> Did you test with this one? You still see the breakage?
Today's linux-next does not have this build failure.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists