[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 04:02:51 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
jeremy@...p.org, x86@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, peterz@...radead.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, attilio.rao@...rix.com, ouyang@...pitt.edu,
gregkh@...e.de, agraf@...e.de, chegu_vinod@...com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi.kivity@...il.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:50:12PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> > On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > >>Please let me know, if I should rebase again.
> > >>
> > >
> > >tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need
> > >to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.
> >
> > Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected.
> > (Xen, kvm are obvious ones).
> > Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.
>
> >From the Xen standpoint anything past v3.11-rc4 would work.
>
For KVM as early as past v3.11-rc1 would be OK.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists