linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH part2 3/4] acpi: Remove "continue" in macro INVALID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52038C84.4080608@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:18:12 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	robert.moore@...el.com, lv.zheng@...el.com, rjw@...k.pl,
	lenb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, trenn@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
	mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
	riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, yanghy@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH part2 3/4] acpi: Remove "continue" in macro INVALID_TABLE().

Hi Joe,


On 08/08/2013 01:27 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 13:03 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>
>> Change it to the style like other macros:
>>
>>   #define INVALID_TABLE(x, path, name)                                    \
>>           do { pr_err("ACPI OVERRIDE: " x " [%s%s]\n", path, name); } while (0)
>
> Single statement macros do _not_ need to use
> 	"do { foo(); } while (0)"
> and should be written as
> 	"foo()"

OK, will remove the do {} while (0).

But I think we'd better keep the macro, or rename it to something
more meaningful. At least we can use it to avoid adding "ACPI OVERRIDE:"
prefix every time. Maybe this is why it is defined.

Thanks. :)

>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> []
>> @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ static const char * const table_sigs[] = {
>>   	ACPI_SIG_RSDT, ACPI_SIG_XSDT, ACPI_SIG_SSDT, NULL };
>>
>>   /* Non-fatal errors: Affected tables/files are ignored */
>> -#define INVALID_TABLE(x, path, name)					\
>> -	{ pr_err("ACPI OVERRIDE: " x " [%s%s]\n", path, name); continue; }
>> +#define ACPI_INVALID_TABLE(x, path, name)					\
>> +	do { pr_err("ACPI OVERRIDE: " x " [%s%s]\n", path, name); } while (0)
>
> Just remove the silly macro altogether
>
>> @@ -593,9 +593,11 @@ void __init acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
> []
>> -		if (file.size<  sizeof(struct acpi_table_header))
>> -			INVALID_TABLE("Table smaller than ACPI header",
>> +		if (file.size<  sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) {
>> +			ACPI_INVALID_TABLE("Table smaller than ACPI header",
>>   				      cpio_path, file.name);
>
> and use the normal style
>
> 			pr_err("ACPI OVERRIDE: Table smaller than ACPI header [%s%s]\n",
> 			       cpio_path, file.name);
>
>> @@ -603,15 +605,21 @@ void __init acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
>
> etc...
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/