[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:07:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, swarren@...dia.com,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, mturquette@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: Tegra: Add CPU's OPPs for using cpufreq-cpu0 driver
On 8 August 2013 19:52, Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> You can certainly define the mapping table in DT where a specialized
> Tegra cpufreq driver could read it in and then map frequency to voltage.
> But that's a runtime decision, as Speedo and process ID are fuse values
> and can not be represented in DT.
> The problem with this is that the hardware description now associates
> voltages with certain frequencies and even if they are not used by the
> Linux driver they are plain wrong.
Hmm. I understand.
Then we probably need mach-tegra/opp.c to call opp_add() for all such
OPPs.. Neither DT nor cpufreq driver are the right place for this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists