lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsGJHxRyi64QYV+BehR7U_g6Hy00fFHOO_moxF0R=zWig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Aug 2013 16:46:54 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	"mszeredi@...e.cz" <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] fuse: drop dentry on failed revalidate

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com> wrote:
> Thanks for attaching the thread. Was very educative! I still do not quite
> understand - will umount() still work when inode_permission()[->getattr()]
> on the ancestors fail (with ESTALE etc.)?

Several cases:

1) mountpoint was removed
2) mountpoint's ancestor removed
3) mountpoint or ancestor moved

1) and 3) would only cause revalidate to fail, not inode operations
(permission or getattr) since the inodes of ancestors still exist.

2) could error out if the ->permission got to the server.  I'm not
sure it will and I don't have an NFS setup handy to test.

So it doesn't necessarily work but it can be made to work, and as
Linus pointed out, it might still be the least worst option.

BTW, attaching a little fuse filesystem that I've been testing this
with.  It's read-only, but the point here is that the tree is modified
*externally*, so that's not an issue.

Thanks,
Miklos

View attachment "fuse_lo.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (8227 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ