[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:44:16 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"trinity@...r.kernel.org" <trinity@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf,arm -- another (different) fuzzer oops
On 08/08/13 05:09, Will Deacon wrote:
> Well spotted, thanks. If you make that return -EINVAL instead of -ENOENT (to
> match what we do for cache events) then:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>
> Could you stick it in the patch system please?
Submitted as 7810/1
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists