[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:11:01 +0200
From: Arne Jansen <sensille@....net>
To: Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>
CC: dsterba@...e.cz, Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: cleanup: removed unused 'btrfs_reada_detach'
On 08/08/13 19:46, Zach Brown wrote:
>>> even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
>>> as it's part of the reada-API and might be handy for anyone going to use
>>> the API in the future.
>>
>> I agree. As replied here,
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg24047.html
>> please keep the function.
>
> If we're keeping score, put me down for being in favour of removing dead
> untested code. git ressurection is easy.
It's not really untested, it has been in use some time ago. But of
course there's a chance that some changes broke it.
Yes, git ressurection is easy. To inform potential users, you might
just leave a comment like this:
/*
* There has been a function once to detach from a running reada.
* If you need such functionality, just revert the commit that
* added this comment.
*/
-Arne
>
> - z
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists