linux-kernel - [ 067/102] Revert "cpuidle: Quickly notice prediction failure in general case"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130809015025.996644747@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu,  8 Aug 2013 18:57:43 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Jeremy Eder <jeder@...hat.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [ 067/102] Revert "cpuidle: Quickly notice prediction failure in general case"

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

commit 228b30234f258a193317874854eee1ca7807186e upstream.

Revert commit e11538d1 (cpuidle: Quickly notice prediction failure in
general case), since it depends on commit 69a37be (cpuidle: Quickly
notice prediction failure for repeat mode) that has been identified
as the source of a significant performance regression in v3.8 and
later.

Requested-by: Jeremy Eder <jeder@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c |   35 +----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 34 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer, menu_hrtimer);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hrtimer_status);
 /* menu hrtimer mode */
-enum {MENU_HRTIMER_STOP, MENU_HRTIMER_REPEAT, MENU_HRTIMER_GENERAL};
+enum {MENU_HRTIMER_STOP, MENU_HRTIMER_REPEAT};
 
 /*
  * Concepts and ideas behind the menu governor
@@ -116,13 +116,6 @@ enum {MENU_HRTIMER_STOP, MENU_HRTIMER_RE
  *
  */
 
-/*
- * The C-state residency is so long that is is worthwhile to exit
- * from the shallow C-state and re-enter into a deeper C-state.
- */
-static unsigned int perfect_cstate_ms __read_mostly = 30;
-module_param(perfect_cstate_ms, uint, 0000);
-
 struct menu_device {
 	int		last_state_idx;
 	int             needs_update;
@@ -223,16 +216,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(menu_hrtimer_cancel);
 static enum hrtimer_restart menu_hrtimer_notify(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	struct menu_device *data = &per_cpu(menu_devices, cpu);
-
-	/* In general case, the expected residency is much larger than
-	 *  deepest C-state target residency, but prediction logic still
-	 *  predicts a small predicted residency, so the prediction
-	 *  history is totally broken if the timer is triggered.
-	 *  So reset the correction factor.
-	 */
-	if (per_cpu(hrtimer_status, cpu) == MENU_HRTIMER_GENERAL)
-		data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = RESOLUTION * DECAY;
 
 	per_cpu(hrtimer_status, cpu) = MENU_HRTIMER_STOP;
 
@@ -389,7 +372,6 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr
 	/* not deepest C-state chosen for low predicted residency */
 	if (low_predicted) {
 		unsigned int timer_us = 0;
-		unsigned int perfect_us = 0;
 
 		/*
 		 * Set a timer to detect whether this sleep is much
@@ -400,28 +382,13 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr
 		 */
 		timer_us = 2 * (data->predicted_us + MAX_DEVIATION);
 
-		perfect_us = perfect_cstate_ms * 1000;
-
 		if (repeat && (4 * timer_us < data->expected_us)) {
 			RCU_NONIDLE(hrtimer_start(hrtmr,
 				ns_to_ktime(1000 * timer_us),
 				HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED));
 			/* In repeat case, menu hrtimer is started */
 			per_cpu(hrtimer_status, cpu) = MENU_HRTIMER_REPEAT;
-		} else if (perfect_us < data->expected_us) {
-			/*
-			 * The next timer is long. This could be because
-			 * we did not make a useful prediction.
-			 * In that case, it makes sense to re-enter
-			 * into a deeper C-state after some time.
-			 */
-			RCU_NONIDLE(hrtimer_start(hrtmr,
-				ns_to_ktime(1000 * timer_us),
-				HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED));
-			/* In general case, menu hrtimer is started */
-			per_cpu(hrtimer_status, cpu) = MENU_HRTIMER_GENERAL;
 		}
-
 	}
 
 	return data->last_state_idx;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/