linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:59:11 -0400
From:	Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
To:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
CC:	"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator

On Aug 8, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:04:36PM -0400, Ed Cashin wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> 
>>> Immutable biovecs are going to require an explicit iterator. To
>>> implement immutable bvecs, a later patch is going to add a bi_bvec_done
>>> member to this struct; for now, this patch effectively just renames
>>> things.
>> 
>> Hi, Kent Overstreet.  Thanks for Cc'ing me and for the promising work.
>> 
>> Were you able to do sanity tests with aoe this time around?  Last time, basic I/O was not working with the immutable biovec patches applied.
>> 
>> Here is my 28 June email about my experiences with git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git at that time.  It also includes information about creating an easy software-only aoe test environment.
>> 
>>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1505222/focus=1517924
> 
> Hey, thanks for testing it - sorry, I think I remember seeing that email
> last time and got sidetracked before I got around to setting up some
> tests.

No worries.

> I think I've got it working now, it's running the same stress tests I
> use for bcache. Here's a fixed patch, I broke the aoe changes out into
> their own patch since they were more involved than most of the others:

I had added your git tree as a remote and checked out the for-jens branch.  This patch conflicts with some of the changes in that patch, so I could use a pointer as to which base this new patch applies to.

If it's already in some branch in linux-bcache, I can just use it there, and that's even more convenient.

> (I am seeing a bug where it's getting stuck after running stress tests
> for awhile, but I can reproduce that without the aoe changes too...)

Just so I know what to look for, what does that behavior look like?  I/O stops going and procs get stuck in disk sleep, maybe?

Thanks.

-- 
  Ed Cashin
  ecashin@...aid.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/