[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130809102802.GC1045@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:28:02 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: Rollback callchain buffer refcount under the
callchain mutex
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:29:54PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When we fail to allocate the callchain buffers, we rollback the refcount
> we did and return from get_callchain_buffers().
>
> However we take the refcount and allocate under the callchain lock
> but the rollback is done outside the lock.
>
> As a result, while we rollback, some concurrent callchain user may
> call get_callchain_buffers(), see the non-zero refcount and give up
> because the buffers are NULL without itself retrying the allocation.
>
> The consequences aren't that bad but that behaviour looks weird enough and
> it's better to give their chances to the following callchain users where
> we failed.
>
> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists