[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130809150257.GM20515@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:02:57 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] workqueue: add new schedule_on_cpu_mask() API
Hello, Chris.
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:49:44PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> This primitive allows scheduling work to run on a particular set of
> cpus described by a "struct cpumask". This can be useful, for example,
> if you have a per-cpu variable that requires code execution only if the
> per-cpu variable has a certain value (for example, is a non-empty list).
So, this allows scheduling work items on !online CPUs. Workqueue does
allow scheduling per-cpu work items on offline CPUs if the CPU has
ever been online, but the behavior when scheduling work items on cpu
which has never been online is undefined. I think the interface at
least needs to verify that the the target cpus have been online,
trigger warning and mask off invalid CPUs otherwise.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists