linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/13] x86: Add 1/2/4/8 byte optimization to 64bit __copy_{from,to}_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri,  9 Aug 2013 16:04:08 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] x86: Add 1/2/4/8 byte optimization to 64bit __copy_{from,to}_user_inatomic

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

The 64bit __copy_{from,to}_user_inatomic always called
copy_from_user_generic, but skipped the special optimizations for 1/2/4/8
byte accesses.

This especially hurts the futex call, which accesses the 4 byte futex
user value with a complicated fast string operation in a function call,
instead of a single movl.

Use __copy_{from,to}_user for _inatomic instead to get the same
optimizations. The only problem was the might_fault() in those functions.
So move that to new wrapper and call __copy_{f,t}_user_nocheck()
from *_inatomic directly.

32bit already did this correctly by duplicating the code.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index 4f7923d..64476bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -77,11 +77,10 @@ int copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 }
 
 static __always_inline __must_check
-int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
+int __copy_from_user_nocheck(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	might_fault();
 	if (!__builtin_constant_p(size))
 		return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force void *)src, size);
 	switch (size) {
@@ -121,11 +120,17 @@ int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 }
 
 static __always_inline __must_check
-int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
+int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
+{
+	might_fault();
+	return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
+}
+
+static __always_inline __must_check
+int __copy_to_user_nocheck(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	might_fault();
 	if (!__builtin_constant_p(size))
 		return copy_user_generic((__force void *)dst, src, size);
 	switch (size) {
@@ -165,6 +170,13 @@ int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 }
 
 static __always_inline __must_check
+int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
+{
+	might_fault();
+	return __copy_to_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
+}
+
+static __always_inline __must_check
 int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -220,13 +232,13 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 static __must_check __always_inline int
 __copy_from_user_inatomic(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 {
-	return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force const void *)src, size);
+	return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, (__force const void *)src, size);
 }
 
 static __must_check __always_inline int
 __copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 {
-	return copy_user_generic((__force void *)dst, src, size);
+	return __copy_to_user_nocheck((__force void *)dst, src, size);
 }
 
 extern long __copy_user_nocache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/