[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130809015029.582087780@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 18:57:58 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: [ 082/102] s390/bitops: fix find_next_bit_left
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
commit 3b0040a47ad63f7147e9e7d2febb61a3b564bb90 upstream.
The find_next_bit_left function is broken if used with an offset which
is not a multiple of 64. The shift to mask the bits of a 64-bit word
not to search is in the wrong direction, the result can be either a
bit found smaller than the offset or failure to find a set bit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static inline int find_next_bit_left(con
size -= offset;
p = addr + offset / BITS_PER_LONG;
if (bit) {
- set = __flo_word(0, *p & (~0UL << bit));
+ set = __flo_word(0, *p & (~0UL >> bit));
if (set >= size)
return size + offset;
if (set < BITS_PER_LONG)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists