[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130810140927.GC3080@localhost>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:09:28 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Introduce atomic MMIO clear/set
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:02:38AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 04:49:28PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > Some SoC have MMIO regions that are shared across orthogonal
> > > subsystems. This commit implements a possible solution for the
> > > thread-safe access of such regions through a spinlock-protected API
> > > with clear-set semantics.
> > >
> > > Concurrent access is protected with a single spinlock for the
> > > entire MMIO address space. While this protects shared-registers,
> > > it also serializes access to unrelated/unshared registers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 5 +++++
> > > arch/arm/kernel/io.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > > index d070741..c84658d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@
> > > #define isa_bus_to_virt phys_to_virt
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Atomic MMIO-wide IO clear/set
> > > + */
> > > +extern void atomic_io_clear_set(void __iomem *reg, u32 clear, u32 set);
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > * Generic IO read/write. These perform native-endian accesses. Note
> > > * that some architectures will want to re-define __raw_{read,write}w.
> > > */
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > > index dcd5b4d..3ab8201 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,30 @@
> > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > #include <linux/io.h>
> > > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > > +
> > > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(__io_lock);
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Some platforms have MMIO regions that are shared across orthogonal
> > > + * subsystems. This API implements thread-safe access to such regions
> > > + * through a spinlock-protected API with clear-set semantics.
> > > + *
> > > + * Concurrent access is protected with a single spinlock for the entire MMIO
> > > + * address space. While this protects shared-registers, it also serializes
> > > + * access to unrelated/unshared registers.
> > > + *
> > > + * Using this API on frequently accessed registers in performance-critical
> > > + * paths is not recommended, as the spinlock used by this API would become
> > > + * highly contended.
> > > + */
> > > +void atomic_io_clear_set(void __iomem *reg, u32 clear, u32 set)
> > > +{
> > > + spin_lock(&__io_lock);
> > > + writel((readl(reg) & ~clear) | set, reg);
> > > + spin_unlock(&__io_lock);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic_io_clear_set);
> >
> > So, one lock is used to all possible registers?
> > Seems a regmap-mmio can be used for such access.
> >
>
> Thanks for the hint! Quite frankly, I wasn't familiar with regmap-mmio.
>
> However, after reading some code, I fail to see how that helps in this case.
>
> Note that we need to access the *same* MMIO address from completely
> different (and unrelated) drivers, such as watchdog and clocksource.
>
> So I wonder who would "own" the regmap descriptor, and how does the other
> one gets aware of that descriptor?
>
> In addition given we can use orion_wdt (originally meant for mach-kirkwood)
> to support mvebu SoC watchdog, we need to sort this out in a completely
> multiplatform capable way.
>
> Ideas?
Answering myself...
How about using drivers/mfd/syscon.c to create the regmap owner for the shared
register (TIMER_CTRL in this case, but others might appear) ?
Or adding a new mfd implementation if syscon does not fit ?
Does this sound like an overkill ?
--
Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists