linux-kernel - Re: [ 000/102] 3.10.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <B8EFE96D1287C24090BAD9D858E15E61762F0A@sisaex02sj>
Date:	Sat, 10 Aug 2013 22:07:08 +0000
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [ 000/102] 3.10.6-stable review

On 08/09/2013 01:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 02:42:24PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 08/09/2013 07:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.6 release.
>>> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun Aug 11 01:46:31 UTC 2013.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.6-rc1.gz
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>

Patches applied to 3.0.89, 3.4.56 and 3.10.5

Compiled and booted on the following systems:

Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
     (3.4.57-rc1, 3.10.6-rc1)
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
     (3.0.90-rc1, 3.4.57-rc1, and 3.10.6-rc1)

dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the 
previous dmesgs for each of these releases. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, 
err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Cross-compile testing:
HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2:
     (3.0.90-rc1, 3.4.57-rc1, and 3.10.6-rc1)

Cross-compile tests results:

alpha: defconfig passed on all
arm: defconfig passed on all
arm64: not applicable to 3.0.y, 3.4.y. defconfig passed on 3.10.y
blackfin: defconfig passed on all
c6x: not applicable to 3.0.y, defconfig passed on 3.4.y, and 3.10.y
mips: defconfig passed on all
mipsel: defconfig passed on all
powerpc: wii_defconfig passed on all
sh: defconfig passed on all
sparc: defconfig passed on all
tile: tilegx_defconfig passed on all

-- Shuah

Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research 
America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/