[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130810074156.GB3467@norris.computersforpeace.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 00:41:57 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, dedekind1@...il.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mtd: gpmi: update the ecc step size for mtd_info{}
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:46:46PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> update the ecc step size when we have already get the right value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> index 53180da..bc598e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> @@ -1598,6 +1598,7 @@ static int gpmi_pre_bbt_scan(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> /* Adjust the ECC strength according to the chip. */
> this->nand.ecc.strength = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength;
> this->mtd.ecc_strength = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength;
> + this->mtd.ecc_step = this->bch_geometry.ecc_chunk_size;
Why do you need a special case here for gpmi-nand? GPMI should be
initializing nand_ecc_ctrl.size (this->ecc.size) to something meaningful
instead of directly setting to 1. Then nand_base will take care of
setting mtd.ecc_step.
Along the same line, you shouldn't need to directly override
mtd.ecc_strength here; you should be setting this->ecc.strength
appropriately.
I see several instances here where gpmi-nand is hacking around
nand_base, rather than using its intended infrastructure.
The right way seems to be to avoid nand_scan() directly but instead to
use nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail() separately (that's what
they're exported for) so that you can initialize any geometry-related
options before nand_scan_tail() does the last steps.
In the end, you shouldn't be needing to override this->scan_bbt at all,
since you really intend to use the default implementation; you just are
doing this to hack around your issues. In fact, I think every use of
nand_default_bbt() outside of nand_base is a design mistake.
> this->mtd.bitflip_threshold = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength;
>
> /* NAND boot init, depends on the gpmi_set_geometry(). */
>
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists