linux-kernel - question about netif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308111151210.2072@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:56:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	romieu@...zoreil.com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: question about netif_rx

To my limited understanding, in a NAPI polling function, one should use 
netif_receive_skb, rather than netif_rx.  However, the via-velocity driver 
defines the NAPI polling function velocity_poll, which is the only caller 
of velocity_rx_srv, which is the only caller of velocity_receive_frame, 
which calls netif_rx.  The call to netif_rx seems to predate the 
introduction of NAPI in this driver.  Is this correct?

thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/