[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130812100728.GL6427@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:07:28 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] spi: s3c64xx: Always select S3C64XX_PL080 when
ARCH_S3C64XX is enabled
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:03:19AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Sunday 11 of August 2013 20:11:40 Mark Brown wrote:
> > Do we need the select here (or should we have other selects for the
> > Exynos SoCs)?
> The driver would build fine without this symbol selected, but since it
> relies on availability of DMA, it doesn't make too much sense to build it
> this way. This kind of selects makes kernel configuration more user
> friendly IMHO.
> Possibly adding appropriate selects (PL330) for s5p* and exynos could make
> sense.
Right. On these SoCs it's probably worth doing it in the arch/arm code
rather than for every device using the controller though, it's the same
DMA controller for everything.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists