lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:02:09 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Cc:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen-blkfront: revoke foreign access for
 grants not mapped by the backend

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:58:39PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 09/08/13 17:08, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 11:10:15AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> On 31/07/13 16:00, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >>> There's no need to keep the foreign access in a grant if it is not
> >>> persistently mapped by the backend. This allows us to free grants that
> >>> are not mapped by the backend, thus preventing blkfront from hoarding
> >>> all grants.
> >>>
> >>> The main effect of this is that blkfront will only persistently map
> >>> the same grants as the backend, and it will always try to use grants
> >>> that are already mapped by the backend. Also the number of persistent
> >>> grants in blkfront is the same as in blkback (and is controlled by the
> >>> value in blkback).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
> > 
> > Roger,
> > 
> > Could you repost patch #2 and #3 (as #1 is in v3.11-rc4) with the
> > comments and the Ack from Matt and Roger's Review-by tag addressed?
> 
> Done (I guess you meant the Reviewed-by tag from David), see below however.
> 
> > Thanks.
> >>
> >> But please see the documentation updates needed below.
> >>
> >>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >>> @@ -1016,13 +1016,38 @@ static void blkif_completion(struct blk_shadow *s, struct blkfront_info *info,
> >>>  	}
> >>>  	/* Add the persistent grant into the list of free grants */
> >>>  	for (i = 0; i < nseg; i++) {
> >>> -		list_add(&s->grants_used[i]->node, &info->persistent_gnts);
> >>> -		info->persistent_gnts_c++;
> >>> +		if (gnttab_query_foreign_access(s->grants_used[i]->gref)) {
> >>> +			/*
> >>> +			 * If the grant is still mapped by the backend (the
> >>> +			 * backend has chosen to make this grant persistent)
> >>> +			 * we add it at the head of the list, so it will be
> >>> +			 * reused first.
> >>> +			 */
> >>> +			list_add(&s->grants_used[i]->node, &info->persistent_gnts);
> >>> +			info->persistent_gnts_c++;
> >>> +		} else {
> >>> +			/*
> >>> +			 * If the grant is not mapped by the backend we end the
> >>> +			 * foreign access and add it to the tail of the list,
> >>> +			 * so it will not be picked again unless we run out of
> >>> +			 * persistent grants.
> >>> +			 */
> >>> +			gnttab_end_foreign_access(s->grants_used[i]->gref, 0, 0UL);
> >>> +			s->grants_used[i]->gref = GRANT_INVALID_REF;
> >>> +			list_add_tail(&s->grants_used[i]->node, &info->persistent_gnts);
> >>> +		}
> >>
> >> Because you only reclaim grants when a request is completed, can you add
> >> text similar to the following to xen/include/public/io/blkif.h (and the
> >> Linux copy).
> >>
> >> feature-persistent:
> >> ...
> >>    When the backend driver needs to unmap a persistent grant it should
> >>    do so prior to completing a request that used that grant reference.
> >>    If a persistent grant is unmapped at any other time, the frontend
> >>    driver may not notice and may be unable to reclaim the grant
> >>    reference.
> >>
> 
> I've sent a patch to update the documentation about persistent grants in
> Xen source tree, but the Linux copy of blkif.h lacks any information
> about the blkif protocol extensions, so I have not added it there. If
> nobody else does it first (before I come back from vacation), I will
> send a patch to add the documentation about all the blkif extensions to
> the Linux copy of blkif.h (and of course add your comment about
> persistent grants unmap).

Please do. It would be good to resync that header file. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ