linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mce: acpi/apei: trace: Include PCIe AER trace event conditionally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130812132613.GF18018@pd.tnic>
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:26:13 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	tony.luck@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, rjw@...k.pl,
	lance.ortiz@...com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mce: acpi/apei: trace: Include PCIe AER trace event
 conditionally

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:13:37AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Yeah, if it's only used on one place, then it's fine. But if it gets
> used in other files, than those other files with have to define the
> macro as well.

Yeah, we need to be careful about this. When a ras tracepoint gets used
in multiple places, I'm guessing it would be cleaner/easier to fork it
out in its own ras-<a-lot-used-tracepoint>.h header, huh?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/