linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] rcu: eliminate deadlock for rcu read site

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130812141449.GI27162@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:14:49 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] rcu: eliminate deadlock for rcu read site

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:10:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:53:10 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:43:59AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > > Hi, Steven
> > > 
> > > I was considering rtmutex's lock->wait_lock is a scheduler lock,
> > > But it is not, and it is just a spinlock of process context.
> > > I hope you change it to a spinlock of irq context.
> > 
> > rwmutex::wait_lock is irq-safe; it had better be because its taken under
> > task_struct::pi_lock. 
> 
> It is? I thought it was the other way around. That is, pi_lock is taken
> under wait_lock.

Urgh, right you are. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/