| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:18:09 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> CC: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>, "Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: choose appropriate handler for level interrupts On 29/07/2013 17:42, Linus Walleij : > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Boris BREZILLON > <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com> wrote: > >> The current implementation handle both edge and level interrupts with the >> 'handle_simple_irq' handler. >> >> Level interrupts are active as long as the pin stays at the configured >> level (low or high). In this case we have to use 'handle_level_irq' which >> mask the interrupt until the handle has treated it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com> > > Nicolas/Jean-Christophe: any opinion on this patch? Back online: Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> (maybe too late though) Thanks for fixing this. Bye, > I am tempted to just apply it and see if you react to it :-) > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists