lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:02:02 -0700 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gcc <gcc@....gnu.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>, Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com> writes: > However, I would really like to > understand what the value is. Probably very little. When I last looked at it, the main overhead in perf currently seems to be backtraces and the ring buffer, not this code. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists