linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65010: Use power efficient workqueue for power polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:33:24 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65010: Use power efficient workqueue for power
 polling

On Fri, 09 Aug 2013, Mark Brown wrote:

> From: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
> 
> There is no need to use a per CPU workqueue to poll, especially with the
> 5s delay used, so allow the scheduler to use any CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/tps65010.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

I'm going to apply the patch and ...

> -		schedule_delayed_work(&the_tps->work, 0);
> +		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &the_tps->work,
> +				   0);

... move this back up onto the line above, if it's all the same to you?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/