linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mce: acpi/apei: trace: Enable ghes memory error trace event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20130812142557.2a43f155@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:25:57 -0300
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	tony.luck@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	rjw@...k.pl, lance.ortiz@...com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mce: acpi/apei: trace: Enable ghes memory error trace
 event

Em Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:04:24 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> escreveu:

> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:49:32AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Clear win from what PoV? Userspace will need to decode a different type
> > of tracing, and implement a different logic for APEI.
> 
> There's no different type of tracing - it is the same info as in both
> cases it comes from APEI.

Well, patch 2/3 is defining a different type of tracing for memory errors,
instead of re-using the existing one.

> And if it can be done in the APEI layer, then
> we don't need the next layer.

Userspace still needs the EDAC sysfs, in order to identify how the memory
is organized, and do the proper memory labels association.

What edac_ghes does is to fill those sysfs nodes, and to call the
existing tracing to report errors.

> > Also, if both ghes_edac and this new tracing is enabled, userspace
> > will receive twice the same event, as two traces will be received for
> > the same thing.
> 
> We are, of course, going to have only one tracepoint which reports
> memory errors, not two.

Yes, that's my point.

Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/