lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:31:32 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To:	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc:	Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Don't disable vmmc if keeping power in suspend

Seungwon and Derek,

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com> wrote:
> On Wed, August 07, 2013, Derek Basehore
>> If we keep power for suspend on a host for dw_mmc, don't disable vmmc-supply
>> regulator when suspending the host.
>
> I have a trivial comment.
> It would be better to add some macro for checking MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER.
> And I just wonder how the problem is silent. Origin code has stood up somewhat long.
> Did you see?
>
> Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Though I reviewed this originally, I'd actually propose not landing it.

I've spent more time with the regulator code in dw_mmc and currently
believe that the regulators should be enabled / disabled in
MMC_POWER_UP / MMC_POWER_OFF.  When we do that then the mmc core will
handle MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER.  You can see my current thoughts on this in
<https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/#/c/65263/>.  I will try to post
that upstream before too long, but feel free to let me know any
comments.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ