linux-kernel - Re: question about netif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308130828550.1997@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:29:24 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, grant.likely@...aro.org,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about netif_rx

On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Francois Romieu wrote:

> Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> :
> > François Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> :
> [...]
> > > Can you send a netif_receive_skb replacement patch for it ?
> > 
> > Just to be sure, I just replace netif_rx by netif_receive_skb, nothing
> > else?
> 
> Yes. It should imho be fine with a comment incluing your analysis and a
> few words about the current state of checksum offloading support.

I wouldn't know what to say about the checksum part.  It is not supported 
so I should use netif_receive_skb?

thanks,
julia