linux-kernel - Re: [ 000/102] 3.10.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130813064154.GA9867@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:41:54 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 000/102] 3.10.6-stable review

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:02:06PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:33:29PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:20:30PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:56:36PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.6 release.
> > > > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Just checked on my OpenBlocks AX3 (dual-core ARMv7 in thumbs mode),
> > > everything seems OK, I did not even notice any performance regression
> > > compared to 3.10.5 on syscall intensive workloads with the recent
> > > changes. I'm sure that I'm using the kuser helpers page since the
> > > system doesn't boot without. Also I did observe minor changes in
> > > /proc/self/maps, but I don't think they should have any impact, so
> > > all in all it's OK :
> > 
> > Wonderful, thanks so much for testing the arm stuff, I wasn't sure I got
> > it all correct in the backport.
> > 
> > One of these days I'll get a system here that I can test arm changes
> > on...
> > 
> Have a look at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/waterfall.
> 
> If everything works as intended, we should get automated builds
> for various platforms, plus automated qemu tests for some of them.
> 
> I have qemu boot tests running for mips (3.4 and 3.10), ppc (3.0, 3.4, 3.10),
> and x86 (3.0, 3.4, 3.10) working. x86_64 and mips64 should follow soon.
> 
> Unfortunately, arm tests don't work yet because of a bug in the arm
> kernel code.
> 
> Builds are started about 30 minutes after a change in the stable-queue
> repository has been detected, and complete after 3-4 hours unless
> the servers are busy doing real work. Which explains why I can annoy
> you with results pretty quickly lately :).

Very nice, thanks for doing this, I'll watch it and see what I can break
:)

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/