linux-kernel - [ 49/60] cifs: dont instantiate new dentries in readdir for inodes that need to be revalidated immediately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130813063338.280568949@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:34:16 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@...ba.org>,
	Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Subject: [ 49/60] cifs: dont instantiate new dentries in readdir for inodes that need to be revalidated immediately

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>

commit 757c4f6260febff982276818bb946df89c1105aa upstream.

David reported that commit c2b93e06 (cifs: only set ops for inodes in
I_NEW state) caused a regression with mfsymlinks. Prior to that patch,
if a mfsymlink dentry was instantiated at readdir time, the inode would
get a new set of ops when it was revalidated. After that patch, this
did not occur.

This patch addresses this by simply skipping instantiating dentries in
the readdir codepath when we know that they will need to be immediately
revalidated. The next attempt to use that dentry will cause a new lookup
to occur (which is basically what we want to happen anyway).

Reported-and-Tested-by: David McBride <dwm37@....ac.uk>
Cc: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@...ba.org>
Cc: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/cifs/readdir.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/cifs/readdir.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/readdir.c
@@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ cifs_prime_dcache(struct dentry *parent,
 			return;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If we know that the inode will need to be revalidated immediately,
+	 * then don't create a new dentry for it. We'll end up doing an on
+	 * the wire call either way and this spares us an invalidation.
+	 */
+	if (fattr->cf_flags & CIFS_FATTR_NEED_REVAL)
+		return;
+
 	dentry = d_alloc(parent, name);
 	if (!dentry)
 		return;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/