[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130813075048.GR27162@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:50:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gcc <gcc@....gnu.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gcc feature request: Moving blocks into sections
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:47:37AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 09:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>
> >> On the majority of architectures, including x86, you cannot simply copy
> >> a piece of code elsewhere and have it still work.
> >
> > I thought we used -fPIC which would allow just that.
> >
>
> Doubly wrong. The kernel is not compiled with -fPIC, nor does -fPIC
> allow this kind of movement for code that contains intramodule
> references (that is *all* references in the kernel). Since we really
> doesn't want to burden the kernel with a GOT and a PLT, that is life.
OK. never mind then..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists