[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130813101123.GP6427@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:11:23 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/16 v2] sound/soc/pxa/mioa701_wm9713.c: Avoid using
ARRAY_AND_SIZE(e) as a function argument
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:52:56AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What is the difference between this and the patch I applied the other
> > day?
> Sorry, it should have also removed the local definition of ARRAY_AND_SIZE?
> I thought that was in the commit message.
It was, sorry - to be hoenst I didn't read beyond the first paragraph
since I'd already applied the patch. If a patch has been applied you
should really send incremental updates rather than resending the patch.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists