[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497141.gLtk1PtyFs@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:47:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Protect cpu map updates from ACPI processor
On Monday, August 12, 2013 06:55:03 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 02:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 12, 2013 09:45:52 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > CPU system maps are protected with reader/writer locks. The reader
> > > lock, put_online_cpus(), assures that the maps are not updated while
> > > holding the lock. The writer lock, cpu_hotplug_begin(), is used to
> > > udpate the cpu maps along with cpu_maps_update_begin().
> > >
> > > However, the ACPI processor handler updates the cpu maps without
> > > holding the the writer lock. This patchset fixes this problem.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > The patchset is based on linux-next of the pm tree.
> >
> > Basically looks OK to me, but I'd just merge the patches together,
> > because the [2/2] is the very reason for the change made by [1/2].
>
> I separated for reviewing purpose, but yes, they can be together. Let
> me know if you need me to re-send it together.
I combined them and added a changelog built out of the messages you sent in
this thread. Please check:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=b9d10be7a8e88fdcb12540387c219cdde87b0795
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists