[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130813120203.GW6427@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:02:03 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] spi: s3c64xx: Do not require legacy DMA API in
case of S3C64XX
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:49:53AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> I've been testing this without any significant patches, like PWM, CCF or
> DT support, just everything from the branch I pointed to and some board-
> specific patches to help in debugging.
I retested with the SPI patches you sent separately yesterday which
didn't make a difference for the SPI issue.
> Anyway, this is the exact branch I've been using:
> git://github.com/tom3q/linux.git v3.12-pl080-devel
I can't test this directly as it has the DAPM bugs I fixed yesterday
in it (those patches will hit -next tomorrow), however it does look like
there's nothing else relevant in there...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists