[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130813121141.GB2188@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:11:41 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtk
 executable
Em Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:48:21PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> To resolve this situation you could help us out by doing either of these:
 
>  1) integrate your tests into tools/, there's 'perf test' that has a ton
>     of testcases already
I think Jiri is working on merging some of those tests, Jiri?
Yeah, these at least:
commit 06933e3a732bb305b0721f1051a45264588e0519
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Date:   Sun Mar 10 19:41:11 2013 +0100
    perf tests: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler counts
commit 5a6bef47b418676546ab86d25631c3cfb9ffaf2a
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Date:   Sun Mar 10 19:41:10 2013 +0100
    perf tests: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler
 
>  2) run your testsuite more frequently - instead of waiting for a stable
>     kernel to be released and then complain about breakage.
My feeling is that he increased the frequency of such tests.
> So far you refused to do any of this and blamed others for non-reported 
> breakages :-/
He has been using the perf trinity fuzzer and reporting problems, thanks
Vince!
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
