lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:11:31 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc:	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dcrisan@...xiant.com, alex@...x.org.uk, ian.campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] xen/m2p: use GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace to
 reinstate the original mapping

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:17:18PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref unmaps a grant and replaces it with a 0
> > > mapping instead of reinstating the original mapping.
> > > Doing so separately would be racy.
> > > 
> > > To unmap a grant and reinstate the original mapping atomically we use
> > > GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace.
> > > GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace doesn't work with GNTMAP_contains_pte, so
> > > don't use it for kmaps.  GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace zeroes the mapping
> > > passed in new_addr so we have to reinstate it, however that is a
> > > per-cpu mapping only used for balloon scratch pages, so we can be sure that
> > > it's not going to be accessed while the mapping is not valid.
> > 
> > This looks to be depend on a new structure, which is not in Linux kernel?
> > Are you missing a dependency patch?
> 
> Nope, GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace and struct gnttab_unmap_and_replace are
> already present in include/xen/interface/grant_table.h.
> 
> 
> > Shouldn't we use some logic to figure out which hypercall to use if the
> > hypervisor does not support it?
> 
> GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace is not a new hypercall, it has been supported
> by Xen for a very long time.
> 
> In a previous iteration of this patch series, I did introduce a new
> hypercall, but then I dropped it because I figured out that I could
> achieve the same thing with the existing hypercall.

OK, Please tack on:

Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>

P.S.
If you could stick it on devel/for-linus-3.12 that would be super. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ