| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <9c8b6b62c4ae45f4c7766b79f083df0e7ba3c52f.1376392602.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:02:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: rjw@...k.pl
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 29/35] cpufreq: s5pv210: Covert to light weight ->target_index() routine
This patch converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for this driver.
CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and will pass index to it.
This drivers wasn't as straight forward as other ones. It was doing some funny
stuff to disable driver while going into suspend mode. This part is simplified
as well to get this converted to ->target_index().
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 54 ++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 0eafc52..bdffc3d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -36,16 +36,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock);
/* Use 800MHz when entering sleep mode */
#define SLEEP_FREQ (800 * 1000)
-/*
- * relation has an additional symantics other than the standard of cpufreq
- * DISALBE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ: disable further access to target
- * ENABLE_FURTUER_CPUFREQ: enable access to target
- */
-enum cpufreq_access {
- DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ = 0x10,
- ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ = 0x20,
-};
-
+/* Tracks if cpu freqency can be updated anymore */
static bool no_cpufreq_access;
/*
@@ -182,12 +173,10 @@ static unsigned int s5pv210_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
return clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
}
-static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- unsigned int target_freq,
- unsigned int relation)
+static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
unsigned long reg;
- unsigned int index, priv_index;
+ unsigned int priv_index;
unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
int arm_volt, int_volt;
@@ -195,9 +184,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
mutex_lock(&set_freq_lock);
- if (relation & ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
- no_cpufreq_access = false;
-
if (no_cpufreq_access) {
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
pr_err("%s:%d denied access to %s as it is disabled"
@@ -207,27 +193,13 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
goto exit;
}
- if (relation & DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ)
- no_cpufreq_access = true;
-
- relation &= ~(ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ | DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
-
freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
-
- if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table,
- target_freq, relation, &index)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto exit;
- }
-
freqs.new = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
- if (freqs.new == freqs.old)
- goto exit;
-
/* Finding current running level index */
if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table,
- freqs.old, relation, &priv_index)) {
+ freqs.old, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
+ &priv_index)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto exit;
}
@@ -563,16 +535,18 @@ static int s5pv210_cpufreq_notifier_event(struct notifier_block *this,
switch (event) {
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
- ret = cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ,
- DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
+ ret = cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
+ /* Disable updation of cpu frequency */
+ no_cpufreq_access = true;
return NOTIFY_OK;
case PM_POST_RESTORE:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
- cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ,
- ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
+ /* Enable updation of cpu frequency */
+ no_cpufreq_access = false;
+ cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ, 0);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
@@ -585,18 +559,18 @@ static int s5pv210_cpufreq_reboot_notifier_event(struct notifier_block *this,
{
int ret;
- ret = cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ,
- DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ);
+ ret = cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
+ no_cpufreq_access = true;
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
static struct cpufreq_driver s5pv210_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
- .target = s5pv210_target,
+ .target_index = s5pv210_target,
.get = s5pv210_getspeed,
.init = s5pv210_cpu_init,
.name = "s5pv210",
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists