[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520A6E5B.3020303@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:35:23 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@...el.com>
CC: devel@...uxdriverproject.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] staging: ozwpan: Make oz_hcd_pd_departed() take
a struct pointer.
Hello.
On 08/13/2013 09:29 PM, Rupesh Gujare wrote:
> oz_hcd_pd_departed() takes struct oz_port pointer instead of
> void *, change function declaration to avoid ambiguity.
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
> index 73d80f2..ed3ffeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
> @@ -720,9 +720,9 @@ out:
> * polled. We release the reference we hold on the PD.
> * Context: softirq
> */
> -void oz_hcd_pd_departed(void *hport)
> +void oz_hcd_pd_departed(struct oz_port *hport)
> {
> - struct oz_port *port = (struct oz_port *)hport;
> + struct oz_port *port = hport;
Do you really need a copy? Isn't it better to rename the parameter and
remove this line altogether?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists