linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/44] cpufreq: at32ap: Use generic cpufreq routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpomcg88NxLqDcb+LqqVVZMwQGNjugHkor_dj4Vzn0yrN2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:24:50 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/44] cpufreq: at32ap: Use generic cpufreq routines

On 13 August 2013 00:41, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no> wrote:
> Around Mon 12 Aug 2013 13:09:25 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 12 August 2013 13:00, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no> wrote:
>>> I'll add it on my todo-list and have a look at it in the evening (-:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> How hard can it be™
>>
>> Its not about being hard but about knowing your platform well..
>
> Turned out to be quite easy, but I couldn't get around to test it on
> hardware (excuse: just moved, all HW is still in a box somewhere).

I had a quick look at it and yes it is pretty much hadware specific :)
Thanks.

> I'll submit the patch to cpufreq@...r.kernel.org for a sanity check, perhaps
> you'll pull it into your series?

Yes, I will.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/