[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520A8054.1030108@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:52:04 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: default CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y
On 08/13/2013 11:43 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> James, does this address your concerns?
>
> You mean for globally enabling CONFIG_EFI on x86? not really for 32
> bit, you say above it's pretty much unusable; I'd prefer just to enable
> it for 64 bit. As you said in your original post "since EFI now is a
> significant percentage of all systems" but you actually mean EFI64 ...
> EFI32 is a pretty insignificant percentage of all systems.
For better or worse, there will be more.
> Can we actually boot a 32 bit kernel on an EFI64 system? The last time
> I tried on my Secure Boot SDV it wouldn't work; the problem is getting
> someting in the transfer of control path to boot the processor back to
> 32 bit mode.
We can boot with a bootloader in "skip stub" mode; no runtime services
yet. We are working on making it possible to boot via a EFI stub in
assisted mode (still needing a bootloader, but with the boot stub in the
kernel.)
Runtime services will be the last piece, obviously, but even that looks
reasonably doable.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists