linux-kernel - Re: question about netif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJJAcoe+GpRYqHyu1xctRaUnPXf4CP8=PTt=svJzJFtBjfqxrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:45:21 +0300
From:	David Shwatrz <dshwatrz@...il.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, grant.likely@...aro.org,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about netif_rx

Hello,
what is the current state of checksum offloading support has to do
with it ? maybe you meant current state of NAPI support ?

regards,
DS

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> wrote:
> Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> :
>> François Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> :
> [...]
>> > Can you send a netif_receive_skb replacement patch for it ?
>>
>> Just to be sure, I just replace netif_rx by netif_receive_skb, nothing
>> else?
>
> Yes. It should imho be fine with a comment incluing your analysis and a
> few words about the current state of checksum offloading support.
>
> --
> Ueimor
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/