linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK=WgbbdY-uZjiO2KBsYGshagykcL0X8PYEByb9K-Wp5R5g+hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:01:17 +0300
From:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Eric Holmberg <eholmber@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'.  The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more generic (like ethernet or pci).  So what would you suggest?

How about 'hwlock' ?

This should be generic enough to cover all instances of hardware locks
(we already know hwspinlock isn't generic enough, as there are some
mutex-like hardware locks which doesn't require busy looping).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/