[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpoksGB6bBtFF4DaqqLME2kpDve5uMycZDCXahaigdRhwKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:52:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg.marvell@...il.com>
Cc: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Add governor operation ongoing flag
On 14 August 2013 13:49, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg.marvell@...il.com> wrote:
> Yes, "START (If STOP passed)", this is important, we don't have this
> patch on our code base, So even Process B's STOP failed(as governor
> enable flag is set to false by process A already ), it can still do
> START operation, So my problem occurs.
> My problem is that I see ondemand governor is started twice during
> frequent governor switch and cpu hotplug stress test.
>
> The After seeing your patch for the return value checking, I think my
> problem should not occur.
> This issue really botherred me for a long time. :(
Exactly, the problem was users of this API were abusing it as they didn't
cared for its return value. I hope that is fixed widely now and in case
some places are still left, they should be fixed as well.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists