[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520B4897.30803@newflow.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:06:31 +0100
From: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@...flow.co.uk>
To: andy@...uder.net
CC: "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] OMAP: allow GPIO pin to enable/disable external UART driver
chip.
On 13/08/13 21:12, Andrew Ruder wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, I've been thinking about this for some time
> and was sad to see it didn't really evoke any sort of discussion :(.
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 02:58:08PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote:
>> When a UART transmitter is connected to (eg) a RS485 driver, it is
>> necessary to turn the driver on/off as quickly as possible. This is
>> best achieved in the serial driver itself (rather than in userspace
>> where the latency can be quite large).
>>
>> This patch allows the GPIO pin to be defined (via DT) that controls
>> the enabling of the driver at the start of a message, and disables
>> the driver when the message has been completed.
>>
>> Still to do:-
>> Allow userspace to turn this feature on/off
>> Do the same for the receiver (useful for 2 wire RS485)
>
> I've been wondering about this as well but I have a slightly different
> situation. On my board the RTS line controls the RS485 transmit/receive
> direction.
>
> I don't know if you've found the Documentation/serial/serial-rs485.txt
> file but it describes, at the very least, a standard API For controlling
> several parameters related to RS485 including configurable delay between
> rts->start of data/end of data->rts. Unfortunately it seems like only
> one driver really implements the full API (Atmel AT91) and I guess it
> needs to be bolted onto each serial driver individually (although it
> seems like a fairly general concept that could be handled at another
> level).
>
> That being said, maybe this patch would better be rethought as a way to
> specify a GPIO for the RTS line (I don't know enough about OMAP and
> whether or not it already provides for hardware flow control in its
> builtin UARTs and you just aren't using it for RS485 flow control?) and
> then in a separate patch implement this already documented user->kernel
> API?
I've actually submitted a newer version that does support the documented
API. See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/102765
Does this address some of your questions ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists